Testimonials

پنجشنبه 24 بهمن 1398
15:33
masoumi5631

The myth of Cinecittà

Cinecittà had not yet been inaugurated, on April 28, 1937, that already this name, happily imposed on others in the ballot (Cinema City, Cinelandia), had passed to indicate more than a physical place or a complex of establishments, the ideal capital or even the heart of Italian cinema. In our historical panorama Cinecittà is far from being the only factory used for the production of films, but it is the one that in the collective imagination has summarized the entire map (Roman and otherwise) of the seventh art. Therefore, in journalistic use and in common speech, artists and personalities who have occasionally worked there are often put in contact with Cinecittà. Flowered on its own, the myth had its most credited celebrant in Federico Fellini. In the book Making a film (1980) the director tells of his first trip to Cinecittà when "up there, more than a thousand meters away, on a Frau armchair firmly screwed to the crane platform, with sparkling leather leggings, a neck scarf of Indian silk, a helmet on his head and three megaphones, four microphones and twenty whistles hanging from his neck was a man: it was him, he was the director, he was Blasetti "(p. 44). Repeatedly repeated with variations (sometimes Fellini claimed to have gone to Cinecittà to bid the star Osvaldo Valenti proposing the purchase of a brilliant fake), the story will then be scripted in the film Intervista (1987) which is a real tribute to the city ​​of cinema from the past to the present. Fellini always came accentuating a visceral relationship with the factories in via Tuscolana, where over the course of over thirty years he has engaged in meticulous and fascinating reconstructions. To name just a few: the sidewalk in via Veneto with the cars in transit in front of the tables of the Café de Paris for La dolce vita (1960); the fantarcheological panorama of Fellini Satyricon (1969), for which film the director settled in an apartment inside Cinecittà, making home and shop; the ring road of Rome (1972); an entire district of Rimini and the profile of the Rex motor ship for Amarcord (1973); eighteenth-century Venice for Federico Fellini's Il Casanova (1976); the transatlantic liner of E la nave va (1983); the television megastudio of Ginger and Fred (1986). This brings us to the sad November 1993 when the master's burning room was set up in Theater 5,

However Fellini, although being the undisputed genius loci, is certainly not the first nor the only founder of the legend of Cinecittà. Alessandro Blasetti contributed to his growth, with the imposing scenography of his films, and many other international directors: from René Clair to Jean Renoir, from Mervyn LeRoy to King Vidor, from William Wyler to Joseph L. Mankiewicz. After the closure between the war and the post-war period, when it was reduced to a refugee camp, in the 1950s Cinecittà became the sumptuous stage of Hollywood on the Tiber with the relative catwalk of the great Hollywood stars. Do you start with the American production of Quo vadis? (1951) to continue with the Fly of War and Peace (1955), the Circus Maximus for the chariot race of Ben Hur (1959), the cyclopean constructions of Cleopatra (1963). On the turn of the 20th century, Dino De Laurentiis simulated the navigation of U-571 submarines (2000); Ettore Scola had you rebuild an entire road in Rome 1938, including the tram line, for unfair competition (2001). These initiatives have revived the splendor of the city of cinema after years dominated by fears that Cinecittà would end up hosting only TV shows or would be swallowed up by building speculation. During that dark period Marcello Mastroianni loved to tell his anguished recurring dream in which, when he arrived at the gates of Cinecittà, he had to crawl on all fours because the whole factory had mysteriously shrunk and was occupied by the Lilliputians. A Gulliver's dream of not difficult interpretation. In the avenues of the city of cinema there are events that have remained memorable. I ran into him, very busy, closed in his sweater and his eternal boots [...] and he came to ask me if I was going to listen to the speech of the Duce [...] Together we merged with the dense and whispering crowd that it was formed right in front of the second restaurant. "Second" implied category, and that was the restaurant where the workers and technicians ate [...] I looked around to see who was there: almost all the actors wearing stage costumes; surrounded by armigers Osvaldo [Valenti], in his black costume by Cesare Borgia [for The Mask of Cesare Borgia, the film that Elsa was also playing in the role of Dianora], Assia [Noris, protagonist of A Romantic Adventure] among the laces of the his romantic character, Maria [Denis] with Dorina's curls and ribbons in Goodbye Youth !, Alida [Valli] in Manon's busty dress, the small beautiful upright head, and many actors, illustrious or not, surrounded by extras in the most varied costumes: even Indian , dancers, odalisques half-naked under the veil trousers. Everyone spoke carefree, as if they had been there for a normal break from their ephemeral and hard work. Suddenly I saw the smile that Camerini was giving me from afar go off, and I found myself immersed in a sudden silence: the radio had begun to transmit Mussolini's voice. At first nobody understood. That voice spoke briefly and was so dry and peremptory that no one, when he was silent, could believe that he had finished speaking [...] Nobody spoke, nobody moved for a few eternal minutes [...] On Camerini's face, over there, hit by the sun, an amazed desolation shone through. Blasetti's eyes were wide open like an abused boy. Valenti was biting his upper lip and his face was hard, bad [...] ". In Cinecittà's mythography, alongside historical events such as the one evoked by de 'Giorgi, there is room for an infinite number of vintage cartoons Anecdotal flavor. Here on the set of Il fiero Saladino (1937), the first film shot in the factory, the young Alberto Sordi tried to conquer the young Alida Valli wrapped in the skin of a stuffed lion. Here the seventeen year old pupil of the Centro Sperimentale Agostino De Laurentiis (not yet Dino) dared to stop the producer Peppino Amato to ask him for work and his daring was rewarded with a small role in Batticuore (1939). Here the sixteen year old Sofia Scicolone,

Not infrequently, Italian cinema has mirrored the city of cinema by setting certain episodes of films in it. One of the most significant is Luchino Visconti's Bellissima (1951), on the subject of Cesare Zavattini, where a frustrated mother, Anna Magnani, would like to redeem herself through her little daughter pushing her to participate in the competition for 'The most beautiful girl in Rome'. The prize is a starring part in a Blasetti film, who spiritually impersonates himself accompanied by the musical theme of Dulcamara in L'elisir d'amore. Visconti recounts servitude and greatness of cinema, cutting out some of its characteristic typologies: see the fatuous factotum meddler interpreted by Walter Chiari, see (taken from life) the wise Liliana Mancini who, after playing the character of Iris in Under the sun of Rome (1948) by Renato Castellani, she adapted to earn her bread in the editing department, aware that "I know so many unfortunate people came out with the illusion of cinema!" ". A gray and unadorned Cinecittà is the setting for the story of Michelangelo Antonioni's The Lady Without Camellias (1953), a bitter portrait of an Italian diva embodied by Lucia Bosè. The avenue of hope (1953) by Dino Risi is dedicated to the famous 'tramway' which took you from Termini Station to Cinecittà in 34 minutes, the story of the ambitions and loves of three young aspiring actresses, as presented in a journalistic clipping of the time: "The avenue of hope is what leads to Cinecittà: together with the passengers, the white-blue trams of the Castles deposit an invisible load of hopes, uncertainties, disappointments, dreams, bitterness and tiredness in front of the magical Temple of Illusion every morning. They are old and new, aspiring artists who knock on the Mecca of cinema with fear and fearless boldness, losers to whom hope no longer smiles, extras who continue to hope in the part that will put them in view: a living world, grappling with the problem of daily bread perhaps more than with that of the dreamed glory ... "Returning to Interview, in Fellini's film the path of the 'tramway' becomes the poetic phantasy of an imaginary journey that sees incongruous landscapes parading beyond the windows celebration of the Grape Festival, the Marmore waterfall,


[ بازدید : 55 ] [ امتیاز : 0 ] [ نظر شما :
]

Cinema history

پنجشنبه 24 بهمن 1398
15:29
masoumi5631

TO

Arsène Lupine


C

Cinema

Cinema

Cinema

Cinema

cinema

Cinema

Cinema, genres


F

FASCISM

filmology

FRAME




H

Hercule Poirot


THE


FRAMING

IMAGE


K

King Kong

King Kong


M

MACCARTISMO

MANIFESTO

MUTE AND SOUND


N

Narrate with pictures

NAZ

NEW AMERICAN CINEMA


P

Introductory itineraries - Fantasies of cinema before cinema

Introductory itineraries - Cinema and the twentieth century

Introductory itineraries - Cinema form in its historical evolution

Introductory itineraries - Scientific omens of a coming cinema


R

REICHS FILMKAMMER


S

CINEMA


T

Testimonials - The myth of Cinecittà


[ بازدید : 44 ] [ امتیاز : 0 ] [ نظر شما :
]

MÉLIÈS, Georges

پنجشنبه 24 بهمن 1398
15:09
masoumi5631

Méliès, Georges

French film director, actor and producer, born in Paris on December 8, 1861 and died in Orly (Paris) on January 21, 1938. With his work M. was able to build a poetic universe in which an extraordinary technical skill (can be considered the he inventor of the main cinematographic tricks still in use) could combine with an authentically visionary spirit, but always accompanied by a remarkable irony. The most famous of his films is Le voyage dans la Lune (1902; Il viaggio nella Luna): the image of the howitzer that hits the eye of the Moon is usually associated with its name as well as the birth of film science fiction.

Born into a wealthy bourgeois family, after completing his studies at the Lycée Louis-le-Grand and ending an apprenticeship in London, he abandoned his father's business in the footwear industry and, with the inheritance quota paid to him by his brothers, he purchased the Théâtre Robert-Houdin (1888) dedicating himself to the illusionist show. After attending the first screening of the cinema Lumière (1895), he decided to use the new device for his shows. He then set up the Star Film company (1896) and set up a laboratory in Montreuil (1897) where, between 1896 and 1912, he would have made half a thousand films, of which about two hundred have been preserved, experimenting with the most diverse genres: films from the true in the manner of the Lumière and actualités reconstituées, that is, more or less spectacular news items reconstructed in the studio. Of the latter we have received Visits sous-marine du "Maine" (1898), dedicated to an episode of the Spanish-American war, L'affaire Dreyfus (1899), illustration of the famous court case that divided French public opinion, Le sacre d'Édouard VII, also known as Le couronnement du roi d'Angleterre Édouard VII (1902), completed by a fortuitous coincidence (the coronation had been postponed), even before the fact had happened. In addition to the news, M. sought inspiration in history, religion and literature, however leading characters and situations to the spirit and forms of the theater of fairs and enhancing the magical and fantastic aspects. Le voyage dans la Lune is also inspired by literary sources, the novels of anticipation by J. Verne and HG Wells, however, providing a comic and surreal interpretation of science and technology. With it M. found a perfect balance between fantasy and comedy and touched the top of his celebrity, which he had reached through a period of feverish experimentation with all the possibilities of the new medium of expression. But among the reasons for the great success of this film, the first blockbuster in the history of cinema (260 meters long, thirty paintings, three months of filming, cost 10,000 francs), are also those of the rapid decline of M's fortune in the States. In fact, it was illegally duplicated, with serious damage to the director who had not yet protected his rights by depositing the negatives on paper at the Library of Congress in Washington, which guaranteed the films a protection similar to that of the books (he only did after the opening of the American branch of the Star Film, directed by his brother Gaston). The same artisanal method that determined the superior quality of his works (rigor of execution of the tricks, quality of the figurative inventions, exactness of the rhythms) was badly reconciled with the needs of a market that required products of faster execution and at competitive prices. Despite the rapid evolution of public tastes, M.'s production continued to focus on makeup. Short films of perfect execution continued to emerge from the Montreuil laboratory: L'auberge du bon repos, La lanterne magique, Le tonnerre de Jupiter, all from 1903, and Le bourreau turc (1904). But the more demanding productions also continued, destined in short to lose their attraction: the féeries inspired by the fairytale tradition (Les 400 farces du diable, 1906; La fée Carabosse, 1906; Au pays de jouets, 1908; Cendrillon, also known as La pantoufle mystérieuse, 1912); astronomical-sci-fi fantasies (Voyage à travers the impossible, 1904, The journey through the impossible; L'éclipse de soleil en pleine Lune, 1907); the surreal satires of progress (Le raid Paris-Montecarlo en deux heures, 1905; Le tunnel sous la Manche ou le cauchemar franco-anglais, 1907; À la conquête du Pôle, 1912).

Abandoned after 1912 the cinematographic activity and now forced to get rid of the negatives of his films due to the lack of the necessary means to guarantee conservation, M. was reduced to managing a heap of toys in Gare de Montparnasse. Only in the late 1920s did French cinema remember this brilliant pioneer: a memorable Gala Méliès was organized in December 1929 and he was assured of accommodation in a rest home for artists in Orly.BIBLIOGRAPHY

Essai de reconstitution du catalog français de la Star-Film suivi d'une analyze catalographique des films de Georges Méliès recensés en France, Service des Archives du film du Center National de la Cinématographie , Bois d'Arcy 1981.

G. Sadoul, Lumière et Méliès , Paris 1985.

A. Costa, The moral of the toy. Essay on Georges Méliès , Bologna 1989².

Méliès, magie et cinéma , éd. J. Malthête, L. Mannoni, Paris 2002 (exhibition catalog).


[ بازدید : 38 ] [ امتیاز : 0 ] [ نظر شما :
]

cinema

پنجشنبه 24 بهمن 1398
15:04
masoumi5631

A technique and an art born in the twentieth century

From the moment when man began to acquire manual skills, he felt the desire to reproduce the reality that surrounded him in visual forms, which would give the most objective description possible. From here the first graffiti, drawings, paintings and sculptures were born. In other words, art was born. But this was basically static, it could not reproduce the movement of real things, of men, animals, plants.

And so it was for thousands of years, until the end of the nineteenth century, when with the invention of the cinema, born from the previous photograph, it not only became possible to reproduce reality, almost, exactly, but also to show it in motion. After millennia, man's dream had finally come true!

The cinema as a development of photography

The term cinematograph derives from the Greek ( kìnema "movement" and gràfo "describe") and means "description in movement". It was used by the French Louis and Auguste Lumière in 1895 for their invention, the cinématographe , later abbreviated to cinéma , "cinema". Together with the kinetograph and kinetoscope invented by the American Thomas A. Edison , it was the arrival point of a series of technical researches carried out during the 19th century, to which the French Étienne-Jules Marey and the American Eadweard Muybridge contributed in particular .

In short, it was a question of realizing a device that could take a certain number of photographs at high speed, not already on a plate - as was the case with the first photographs - but on a transparent film, long enough to contain a few hundred. Lumière and Edison, separately, built their luminaires which, at the speed of 16 frames per second, resumed reality in motion and returned it when the exposed film was projected (in the case of the cinématographe ) or viewed individually through a particular viewer (with the kinetoscope ). For a short film of one or two minutes - the first films of Lumière and Edison lasted as long - it took from 900 to 2,000 photographic poses and a film from 27 to 54 meters long.

These first short cinematic shows - which the Lumières inaugurated on December 28, 1895 in Paris, inviting a large and select group of spectators - consisted of a dozen mostly documentary films: La sortie des usines Lumière ("The exit of the workers from Officine Lumière "), Arrivée d'un train en gare de La Ciotat (" The arrival of a train in La Ciotat station "), Pêche aux poissons rouges (" Fishing for goldfish "), La Rue de la République à Lyon ("Via della Repubblica in Lyon") and others, up to what is considered the first 'comic film' in the history of cinema: L'arroseur arrosé ("The watered waterer").

An immediate success

The public success was immediate and the cinema soon spread to other French cities and other European countries. During 1896 and in the following years there was no big city in the world that did not have its own cinema. At the end of the 19th and early 20th century, while in the provinces, villages and villages, cinema came on the occasion of popular festivals - and from time to time the screen had to be mounted and a temporary hall set up - There were now many cinemas in the city where films were regularly shown according to a program that varied from week to week. In short, in the space of a decade or so, the cinema had become a regular spectacle, followed by millions of spectators scattered almost in every corner of the world, and the films,

From the static photography of the early nineteenth century to the dynamic photography of the early twentieth century the journey had been long, but the results achieved were nothing short of extraordinary. From here are derived not only the success of the first films, but also the widespread diffusion that cinema would have had, becoming in fact the popular show by definition. However, this role has been 'stolen' from television, which nonetheless dedicates a not inconsiderable space to the daily broadcast of many films on the television screen.

The most popular popular show

The spread of cinema as a genre of entertainment and of cinemas as rooms for the public screening of films - and in this case the term cinema has a double meaning - was the signal that the invention of the Lumières had responded to the expectations of all humanity that , as has been said, he dreamed of an instrument capable of reproducing reality in motion. And this also against the opinion of the Lumière brothers themselves, who initially did not think at all that cinema would become what it instead became!

Soon, however, we realized that all this was no longer enough. In fact, it was not possible to repeat endlessly, without tiring the public, the arrival of a train or the exit of workers from a factory, nor even the dynamic visions of known and lesser known cities, distant landscapes, people and customs unknown and so on. The Lumière catalog, made up of hundreds and hundreds of documentary films, risked being exhausted in the continuous repetitiveness of the subjects.

Something new and more stimulating was needed. It was necessary to pass from passive reproduction of reality in movement to narrative, dramatic, fantastic invention. In short, it was necessary to make cinema a new 'theater', that is, a show in all respects, with actors, sets, environments, stories to tell. And cinema became the 'theater of the poor', because it was cheap, we went there at any time of the afternoon and evening, alone or accompanied, without particular pomp or elegance in dressing. A show that did without the stage and the actors in flesh and blood and was satisfied with a screen, that is to say with a sheet hanging at the back of the room. On this screen, however, the images of the actors flowed against the backdrop of scenographies, equally and perhaps even more suggestive than the theatrical ones. There was no voice at the time, because the films were silent; they became sonorous from 1927. So the actors did not speak, but written signs, the so-called captions, contributed to make the progress understood; while in the room a pianist, in some cases an entire orchestra, accompanied the projection by providing the sound commentary, in this musical case.

Evolution of the films

A very important fact was that the films had gone from the minute, or the few minutes, of the first documentaries, to the duration of half an hour, then an hour, finally an hour and a half and even more. Therefore, the feature films that constituted a complete show by themselves were born . Beginning in the 1910s, feature films began to be produced almost exclusively, while the short duration - that of the short film - was destined only to topical documentaries or comedies which, according to a very widespread practice at the time, completed the program, concluding it in beauty; hence the expression 'final comic'.

It is from that period that we can speak of cinema as the popular show par excellence, since the films produced are numerous, as are the spectators. The latter gradually deserted the theater to close themselves in the dark projection room and enjoy the beauty of those self-propelled images, still in black and white but very fascinating. They could admire not only sometimes exotic places and adventurous characters, but also the close-ups of the actors and actresses, their attitudes and movements magnified on the screen, their face and their acting amplified according to the taste of the time and the need to make up for the absence of the word with the gesture. A way of acting that today may seem forced and even ridiculous,

The Lumière method and the Méliès method

The documentary cinema therefore gradually ran out in favor of the spectacular one. Already at the end of the 19th century, in fact, when the Lumières were shooting their short films, a theater man, the Frenchman Georges Méliès, illusionist and magician, had sensed the fantastic possibilities of the new device. He built his own and began making subject films, with sets, optical tricks, special effects, bringing his theatrical performances and prestige games to the screen with a more sophisticated technique. And putting not a little of his paradoxical taste, of his grotesque humor. Suffice it to mention, for everyone, his films inspired by Jules Verne, The Journey to the Moon (1902) and À la conquête du Pôle("Conquering the Polo", 1912), two milestones of fantastic and futuristic cinema.

Méliès was unable to continue on the road taken for various technical and commercial reasons: in fact he was only a craftsman of cinema who did almost everything alone, in a period in which cinema was becoming an industry. However his lesson was not forgotten. All spectacular cinema, perhaps indirectly and unknowingly, derives from his pioneering work. Think not only of adventurous, science fiction films, with special effects, but also of other films, which are essentially based on the actors, on the sets, on the narrative and dramatic developments of the stories. And it was these films that got the better of documentaries, even if documentary cinema had its own development and history that last until today, with artistic, informative or educational results of great value.

The industrial development of cinema and divism

In the field of spectacular cinema, beyond what we can call the 'Méliès phase', a remarkable industrial development took place. The film industry soon became one of the most flourishing and profitable industries. First in France, then in Italy and in the rest of Europe, finally in the United States with the foundation of Hollywood, the neighborhood of film studios on the outskirts of Los Angeles, where the weather is always nice and the films can be shot in the sunlight , without the expensive and not always easy use of artificial light.

Directors, scriptwriters, operators and various technicians, actors and extras gave birth to hundreds and hundreds of films per year, made by drawing on most of the time literature and theater of every era and country, condensing and illustrating novels and comedies, poems and tragedies. But the story and the epic were not spared, the real and imaginary characters, personified by actors and actresses who seduced and excited the audience. Thus was born divism, or the phenomenon for which certain very popular actors began to arouse in the public an infatuation so strong as to reach fanaticism, a real cult of the stars. This also happened thanks to the suggestion of the characters interpreted, to the type of acting in which the body and face of the actor or actress was highlighted,

The first blockbusters

They also began to make films of great proportions, two or three hours long, spectacularly grandiose, real blockbusters, as they were defined later. Films that the public savored as something extraordinary and impossible to make on any theatrical stage. Suffice it to recall the Italian Cabiria , directed and produced by Giovanni Pastrone in 1914, a work that lasted three hours, in which the poet Gabriele D'Annunzio and the musician Ildebrando Pizzetti had collaborated . A film about Romanity, an adventurous story with historical and invented characters, which had a resounding success and gave rise to American spectacular cinema, whose first great director was David W. Griffith , the author ofThe birth of a nation (1915) and Intolerance (1916). Since then, and for all the decades to come, Hollywood cinema, and consequently that of other countries, developed along the way of an increasingly attractive spectacle, using all the technical and artistic means it could have. So much so that, for at least forty years, and then again in more recent times, Hollywood production has been identified with spectacular cinema by definition.

Cinema and society

The spread of cinema all over the world has given rise to a series of national schools and particular cinemas, with specific authors and producers. The world public has made a varied and complex use of all these products. Born as a scientific curiosity, which soon became a spectacle for everyone, fun and pastime, cinema then acquired various functions: political, cultural, social, artistic. Dictatorships, but also democracies, have often used it for propaganda or political debate purposes: such as the pro-Nazi films of Leni Riefenstahl.

Spectators have often appreciated and shared the cultural, informative and documentary function of cinema, inside and outside school or university: think of the great nature documentaries produced by Walt Disney and others after him.

The social impact that cinema has had in transforming customs, fashion and tastes is there for all to see: just think of the phenomenon of divism mentioned above.

Cinema, culture, art

It should not be overlooked, indeed it deserves to be underlined the artistic aspect of cinema, that is the place it occupies in the panorama of contemporary arts: think of the hundreds of films made by film directors-artists who are considered to all intents and purposes masterpieces of art Contemporary. Indeed, in some respects, it is precisely cinema that took on a dominant position during the twentieth century, often superior to that of traditional arts, which over time became products for a restricted intellectual elite. On the one hand, he profited from the previous artistic tradition: figurative arts, literature, theater, music; on the other hand it influenced its subsequent developments, thanks to the cinematographic movements, the new trends and currents that characterized certain periods, putting into crisis and radically changing the very structure of art as it is understood today. It would be enough to mention the various avant-gardes of the 1920s, as well as the visual arts of the last decades, fromAmerican pop art onwards. This is to say that the film show does not end only in this or that film seen with friends, fun, adventurous, dramatic or comic.

it is a more complex phenomenon, to be studied carefully because it contains the same constituent elements of traditional arts, which, as is known, require a less simplistic and elementary approach. With this, we do not want to force the film viewer to study, to have to develop an in-depth critical preparation to grasp all aspects of a film, beyond the pleasure of viewing. This pleasure certainly remains at the center of the film show, equivalent to the pleasure of reading for a novel, or the pleasure of listening for a piece of music. However, there may also be a more in-depth type of 'reading', as is the case for literature, music and the figurative arts.

Movies set intelligence in motion

A film is, or can be, a complete form of expression from which emotions, sensations, intellectual pleasures, intense life experiences are derived. All this does not contrast with its nature of pure fun, but enriches it, making it something else, more intimate and personal. Of course we talk about the films, of yesterday and today, which give us a new vision of the world, which set in motion our intelligence and our sensitivity. Certainly not many, they often get lost in the indistinct mass of the many 'normal' films, sometimes mediocre, other times even poor. But those few films show us that cinema, when used properly, is one of the pillars of our culture. What would the civilization of the twentieth century be without the cinema? How would we see the reality that surrounds us without ever having had a cinema spectator experience? Television could not exist without the invention of cinema, of which it is a daughter. Indeed, today, it is precisely the television that proposes and re-proposes daily the films of the past: irreplaceable repertoire of our culture and our collective memory.


[ بازدید : 39 ] [ امتیاز : 0 ] [ نظر شما :
]

CHOMÓN, Segundo de

پنجشنبه 24 بهمن 1398
14:44
masoumi5631

Spanish film director and operator, born in Teruel (Spain) on 18 October 1871 and died in Paris on 2 May 1929. After Georges Méliès, C. was the pioneer who more than others contributed to the development of the so-called make-up film in the history of cinema of origins, as well as being the first Spanish filmmaker to have gained international prominence prior to the advent of sound. Expert connoisseur of the animation technique, he was able to take full advantage of all his possibilities, such as, for example, the 'single shot' shooting, thanks to which it became possible to give life to inanimate objects. He must also be recognized for having introduced the use of Chinese shadows with which to tell surreal and fantastic stories, always beyond the limit of verisimilitude.

After a brief experience in the army, C. turned to the cinema, working first as a representative of Pathé in Spain, and later as an operator for the same production company. In 1902 he opened a laboratory for the creation of films, where the development, printing and coloring of the film was also carried out, first with the use of special stencils and, starting from 1906, with the use of a manual technique that proceeded frame by frame. From 1905 to 1910 he lived in Paris, where he was the director of Pathé's special effects department. Later he moved to Turin to work in the Itala Film studios. Starting in 1908 his cinema had a turning point, due to the full maturation of the very concept of 'trickery' films, in which the found spectacular, applied to inanimate objects, it served to arouse wonder in the spectator. Subsequently, while maintaining the use of these stratagems, C. began to insert in his works the narrative element that acquired a solid structure from film to film. Examples are La légende du fantôme (1907), Le petit pouchet, Voyage au planète Jupiter and Le voleur invisible all from 1909. The first ten years were particularly prolific, during which, when he returned to Barcelona, ​​he worked with frenetic rhythm on films of different inspiration. He adapted zarzuela (a sort of operetta of Spanish national tradition) for the big screen, shot comedy films, melodramas, phantasmagorias which, however, did not find adequate distribution in Spain. Only three titles have survived from this period, all dating back to 1912: L'iris fantastique, Superstition andalouse, phantasmagorias deeply renewed in structure and form, and Métamorphoses, a work where the fantastic element fits harmoniously into the narrative context. At the express request of the Italian director Giovanni Pastrone, C. became part of the Itala Film of Turin as director of photography, creating, among others, Cabiria (1914) by Pastrone himself, where he experimented the tracking shot in the studio in operation artistic and expressive. In 1917 C. himself directed Momi's War and the Dream, which unites actors and animated puppets. The last work of his intense career was the realization of some interesting visual tricks in Abel Gance's Napoléon (1927). work where the fantastic element fits harmoniously into the narrative context. At the express request of the Italian director Giovanni Pastrone, C. became part of the Itala Film of Turin as director of photography, creating, among others, Cabiria (1914) by Pastrone himself, where he experimented the tracking shot in the studio in operation artistic and expressive. In 1917 C. himself directed Momi's War and the Dream, which unites actors and animated puppets. The last work of his intense career was the realization of some interesting visual tricks in Abel Gance's Napoléon (1927). work where the fantastic element fits harmoniously into the narrative context. At the express request of the Italian director Giovanni Pastrone, C. became part of the Itala Film of Turin as director of photography, creating, among others, Cabiria (1914) by Pastrone himself, where he experimented the tracking shot in the studio in operation artistic and expressive. In 1917 C. himself directed Momi's War and the Dream, which unites actors and animated puppets. The last work of his intense career was the realization of some interesting visual tricks in Abel Gance's Napoléon (1927). Itala Film of Turin as director of photography, realizing, among others, Cabiria (1914) by Pastrone himself, where he experimented the tracking shot in the studio in an artistic and expressive function. In 1917 C. himself directed Momi's War and the Dream, which unites actors and animated puppets. The last work of his intense career was the realization of some interesting visual tricks in Abel Gance's Napoléon (1927). Itala Film of Turin as director of photography, realizing, among others, Cabiria (1914) by Pastrone himself, where he experimented the tracking shot in the studio in an artistic and expressive function. In 1917 C. himself directed Momi's War and the Dream, which unites actors and animated puppets. The last work of his intense career was the realization of some interesting visual tricks in Abel Gance's Napoléon (1927).BIBLIOGRAPHY

Especial Segundo de Chomón , in "cinemarescat", 2000, 9, nr. monograph.


[ بازدید : 37 ] [ امتیاز : 3 ] [ نظر شما :
]
تمامی حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به biographycinema است. || طراح قالب avazak.ir
ساخت وبلاگ تالار اسپیس فریم اجاره اسپیس خرید آنتی ویروس نمای چوبی ترموود فنلاندی روف گاردن باغ تالار عروسی فلاورباکس گلچین کلاه کاسکت تجهیزات نمازخانه مجله مثبت زندگی سبد پلاستیکی خرید وسایل شهربازی تولید کننده دیگ بخار تجهیزات آشپزخانه صنعتی پارچه برزنت مجله زندگی بهتر تعمیر ماشین شارژی نوار خطر خرید نایلون حبابدار نایلون حبابدار خرید استند فلزی خرید نظم دهنده لباس خرید بک لینک خرید آنتی ویروس
بستن تبلیغات [X]